Throughout the history of fashion, breasts have been a major asset. Cleavage, titties, mammaries, boobies – they complete the outfit. The make it look good. Nearly all of the best models have had figures, INCLUDING a nice rack (except for those who became famous during the heroin chic era – I wouldn’t say having your figureless body compared to a heroin addict is a compliment).

It wasn’t until American Apparel, one of the biggest rip offs in the world, became popular that flat chested girls had their moment in the sun. What American Apparel likes to do is take basics and turn them into centerpieces of an outfit. All of a sudden a jersey t-shirt or a cap sleeve henley in 10 different colors is the cool thing to have.

Then of course, there is the v-neck. The infamous v-neck. A staple product in every scene/emo/indie/i-think-im-original kid’s closet. Most importantly, this is the GOLDEN TICKET for girls with no boobs. For once, girls with no tits have something to boast about. They have something that looks good on them and BAD on girls with a cup size bigger than a small B.

But is this really even a fashion item to gloat about? Does anyone really consider a v-neck a major fashion contribution? It’s an undershirt for god’s sake. You can buy a pack of 3 of them at target for 10 bucks.

I just think its funny. Don’t take me too seriously (although, I am quite serious). Continue to wear your v-necks and pair it with a cute little scarf. But what the Itty Bitty Titty Committee needs to do is elect someone to design extremely fashionable apparel for the “lacking”…because when these v-necks are ’so over’, your glory days will be too.